Tags

, , , , , ,

LAZ g10_2_g11

LAZ with CAZ richnesses for g10 and g11

What causes the critical threshold increase of secondary extinction in a typical CEG simulation? It cannot be a simple result of increasing the perturbation magnitude, \omega; that is given by topololgical secondary extinction. CEG differs from the simple topological model in several ways. First, link strengths are not uniform but are instead a function of in-degree. Second, nodes are not equivalent, but have dynamic population sizes. And third, there are topdown effects. Somehow, top down feedback initiates catastrophic collapse at a very specific perturbation magnitude. Bel ow that threshold, responses are dampened. Why? I hypothesize that at the threshold, a giant component in the network is activated. Given that the component is present no matter the magnitude of perturbation, activation must depend on link strengths, which in CEG are dynamic.

Advertisements